
Revista Iberoamericana de la Educación, Vol - 7 No.4, October – December 2023
State of the Art (or Theoretical Considerations) on the efficiency of virtual collaborative work activities in
the learning process.
which classes move from 5 levels, to be more cohesive and
heterogeneous.
In this sense, a Lesson Study is created, in which a group of educators
(3-6) of the same subject, choose a specific class, which is designed
considering what the learners should learn, designing a lesson
together, appointing one person among the participants to teach the
lesson. When an action-research is carried out, the other members
observe what is happening and notes are taken, and the findings are
then discussed in order to find improvements, correcting and
improving the lesson, based on feedback from the praxis of the
teachers involved, with another version being carried out by another
participant.
The idea of what was mentioned in the last paragraph is that it should
take the form of a dissemination format. This organization has its
own scientific journal: The International Journal of Lesson and
Learning Studies. This idea is expanding, as it is an attempt to cope
with student heterogeneity, since it is necessary to consider the
critical aspects of content, which a learner needs to discern in order
to continue his way of learning, calling this: Learning keys, which
vary according to the learning objects, learning groups and the
learner's own individuality. ". (Holmqvist Olander, 2015, pp. 49-51)
CONCLUSIONS
In the present century, the study of teaching and learning is becoming
more and more important, so it can be deduced that the "learning
study" is a collaborative development of a lesson (it can also be a
study unit, a didactic unit, a concrete lesson, a learning activity, ...),
which is developed through a series of research sessions of the
teachers involved. ), which is developed through a series of research
sessions of the teachers involved.
It is of feedback that, "In Sweden, and early on in Hong Kong, the
Learning Studio was considered a form of "design experiment" rather
than a form of action research." (Elliott, 2010, p. 223)However,
educators were provided with spaces for the development of their
curricula, giving rise to the theory of variation, as a pedagogical
proposal of action research, oriented to learning and very much
dependent on the educational authorities and their management of
resources, time and personnel involved in this professional
educational research, and therefore on the situation of the institutional
Scientific Research.
The idea of the teacher as researcher vindicates the idea of teacher
autonomy in the face of the imposition of standardized curricula.